As of right now, few if any resources on publishing your first academic book talk at all about this stage. In the future, I will publish an article specifically on responding to reviewer reports. You have a contract, and now all you have to do is make the changes you promised, and submit the final manuscript. Most first-time academic book authors find stage 6 the hardest of all. If you are not interested in doing your own index, you should apply for funds at your school to cover indexing fees.

The press will not usually not pay for indexes. Finally, do take responding to queries and checking the proofs seriously. Your book is now out in the world and have received your author copies.

The 7 Stages of Publishing Your First Academic Book, Challenges & Tips

For me, this stage was somewhat anticlimactic because in many ways, it felt like I had finished the book months prior. In this stage, you should focus on two tasks. First, you should continue marketing your book. During the next two years, you will also submit your book for prizes. In the future, I will publish more materials on what to do after the first book. But the best thing I did during these two years was to continue to give conference papers and read new works of literature.

I, like many other first-time academic book authors, have found that the process really is much easier the second time around. Where are you in the stages of publishing your first academic book? Do you have questions about a situation not discussed above? Did you find this definitive guide spot on? Or, do you know someone who is revising her dissertation into her first academic book?

A writing partner confused about academic book proposals? Writing your first academic book in a humanities or qualitative social science discipline? Wondering how to manage such a large project? You don't have to struggle alone! Sign up, and I'll send you resources and advice to help you get a handle on your manuscript , find the best publisher , and develop productivity habits to get the book done. Your email address will not be published.

Notify me of follow-up comments by email.

Notify me of new posts by email. We might be overly proud of having our baby finally sent out into the world, but then it will dawn upon us: the majority of researchers would prefer to read a page paper about a more specific part of this research than plow through our pages of labor. The only one who would ever want to read through it all and spend an entire week making sense of your thesis is a fellow PhD student…. And thus, for most of us "big book"-thesis-writing-and-publishing folks, we'll need to revisit all our material again after publication of the thesis, and turn it into a number of journal papers.

  • Author Guidelines.
  • cause and effect of tornadoes essay.
  • Background.
  • When do you have to write a literature review?.

If you are lucky enough to get into a post-doc position that is fully research-oriented, you have all the time or at least, you might think you have to write your papers. If you venture out into the industry, you'll have to do it in your evenings and weekends. Regardless of the time constraints , it's still extremely valuable to take the step of turning your dissertation into journal papers. Two years past my thesis defense, I'm reaching the end of this process with a number of papers published, a number in review and a few more to write. Below are some of my observations on the process.

After you graduate, life is going to take over. Take some time while your dissertation is still freshly printed, and ask yourself the following questions:. Then, start planning paper by paper. I typically give my co-authors maximum a month to send their feedback. What is your main point in presenting this review? Describe the background and qualifications of the author. How accurate and current is the information presented?


Does the evidence support the conclusions? How current is the information presented?

My Step by Step Guide to Writing a Research Paper

How does it compare with other works on the same subject? What are your overall comments and conclusions about the book? Why or why not would you recommend the book to others? What is your overall assessment of the book? Provide support for your statements about the book in the form of examples. Are there any noteworthy statements or wording quotations you could cite to illustrate various points in your review? When quoting from the book, add the page number in parentheses immediately following the quote.

Do not exceed words. Please visit the privacy policy page to read the policy. Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer. Submission Preparation Checklist As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.

Submission is in MS Word or rich text format. If you are submitting a Research Article, the word count is between and and have indicated this on the front page of your article. If you are submitting a Note, Literature Review, or Book Review, you have clearly indicated this in the metadata and note to Editor.

The submission has not been previously published and is not under review at another journal. If your article is derived from a thesis or dissertation, please provide the name of the institution to which it was submitted, the date of submission, the author s , and the supervisor.

Authors' Update

The submission has been prepared for double-blind peer review by ensuring that there are no identifiers in the article. Authors must confirm that: They have deleted their names from the entire article, including references and citations, and have inserted "Author" in its place.

Titles of published papers by the authors have been replaced with "Deleted for Peer Review. All electronic references include the DOI if available. If the submission is for a Special Issue, indicate the name of the special issue in the title and editor comment section.

Including Published, Co-authored, or Collaborative Material in a Thesis or Dissertation

Data has been collected and analyzed in an appropriate manner, ensuring regard for the privacy of subjects. The researcher s confirm that they have followed ethical standards for research involving human participants such as those at detailed for Canadian researchers.

Research Articles must have a word count within words, including all references, appendices, tables, and figures. Submissions that exceed this limit will not be accepted for review. Notes sections are normally below words. Literature reviews with analyses may be acceptable with a large number of references that exceed the word limit; however, they must be clearly labelled.

Abstract between words and Keywords at least 4 must follow the title.